Abraham Ruddell Barton/ Hester Taylor Beauchamp
Replies: 0
Abraham Ruddell Barton/ Hester Taylor Beauchamp
|
|
Posted: 28 Jun 2009 6:22PM GMT |
Classification: Query
Surnames: Barton, Beauchamp,
Descendants of Abraham Ruddlell Barton
1 [1] Abraham Ruddlell Barton b: 02 Sep 1822 in , Lincoln County, Missouri, USA d: 02 Jan 1917 in Elsberry, Lincoln, Missouri, USA
.. +Hester Taylor Beauchamp b: 14 Oct 1828 in , , Kentucky, USA m: 27 May 1847 in , Pike, Missouri, USA d: 16 Jun 1898 in , Pike, Missouri, USA
.. 2 John Mulhern Barton b: 1848
.. 2 M. Frances Barton b: 1848
.. 2 Sarah Barton b: 1857
.. 2 Emma Barton b: 1859
.. 2 Virginia Barton b: 1861
.. 2 Martha Barton b: 1864 *2nd Wife of [1] Abraham Ruddlell Barton:
.. +Elizabeth LNU b: 1846 m: 1899
If you can review these 1870 and 1880 census records --
(1870)
http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1870usfedcen&a...
(1880)
http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1880usfedcen&a...
please tell me if you think this is the same family. At first glance it would appear this is so but the birth dates are really off. Hard to believe census taker could make such large errors.
Can anyone confirm it is . . . or isn't . . . the same family?
If so, please reply direct to LibralLady@aol.com
Thanks!
d
1 [1] Abraham Ruddlell Barton b: 02 Sep 1822 in , Lincoln County, Missouri, USA d: 02 Jan 1917 in Elsberry, Lincoln, Missouri, USA
.. +Hester Taylor Beauchamp b: 14 Oct 1828 in , , Kentucky, USA m: 27 May 1847 in , Pike, Missouri, USA d: 16 Jun 1898 in , Pike, Missouri, USA
.. 2 John Mulhern Barton b: 1848
.. 2 M. Frances Barton b: 1848
.. 2 Sarah Barton b: 1857
.. 2 Emma Barton b: 1859
.. 2 Virginia Barton b: 1861
.. 2 Martha Barton b: 1864 *2nd Wife of [1] Abraham Ruddlell Barton:
.. +Elizabeth LNU b: 1846 m: 1899
If you can review these 1870 and 1880 census records --
(1870)
http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1870usfedcen&a...
(1880)
http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1880usfedcen&a...
please tell me if you think this is the same family. At first glance it would appear this is so but the birth dates are really off. Hard to believe census taker could make such large errors.
Can anyone confirm it is . . . or isn't . . . the same family?
If so, please reply direct to LibralLady@aol.com
Thanks!
d