Brinegar - Family History & Genealogy Message Board

Re: Veith Bruninger (Brinegar) from Palatinate, Germany

craktpot — 2012-05-03 22:13:29Z

Hi!
I have just learned that I am a descendant of Veith Bruninger. My line runs through Adam, but I would love to have a copy of Anna's picture and any info you may have. I have read your page and enjoyed the insights!
Teri Brinegar Emerson
craktpot@gmail.com

Veith > Adam > Jacob > Joseph Stoneman Brinegar > Abraham Orton > Robert Abraham > Don Orton > Jerry Don > ME!

Re: THOMAS BRINEGAR-SUSANNA DAUGHERTY

picancoj — 2012-04-14 00:31:03Z

Hello, looking for Thomas LaRoy Brinegar -started out in MN was born 1920, his father was Jesse P. Brinegar (KY) and Ruth Louise Mulholland (MN). Thanks

Re: Brinegars

lstndish — 2012-03-15 02:54:15Z

Gordon Asbury was my sister's great-grandfather, his daughter Ethel was her grandmother on her father's side.

Re: Brinager/Baker, Carter Co. & Greenup Co. KY

Dreamgrdn — 2012-02-01 12:38:12Z

Hi Earl, I'm hoping you could help me. I have two George Washington Brinegar's in my tree that I think may be the same person. I have a George Washington Brinegar, born 4 Jul 1888 in Olive Hill, KY; died 15 Jan 1969 in Greenup County, KY; married to Phoebe Maddox (1886-1983). Children for George & Phoebe: Ollie, Ethel, Mack Ora, Stella, Lilly, Andrey, Estel, Mabel, Eva, Augusta, Virginia, and George.

I don't have any parents listed for this George Washington Brinegar.

The other George Washington Brinegar I have in my tree may have changed his last name to Baker. I have his mother as Lilly Wade Brinegar. I don't have any birth or death dates for this George Washington Brinegar-Baker.

Do you know if these are the same person?

Thanks for any help you can provide.

~ Chris S.

JoAnn Brinegar Kiser b. Olive Hill, Kentucky

Lace_Lynch — 2011-11-02 13:14:49Z

MANSFIELD: JoAnn Brinegar Kiser, 76, of Mansfield, Ohio passed away Monday, October 31, 2011 at MedCentral Mansfield Hospital.

JoAnn was born October 4, 1935 in Olive Hill, Kentucky to McKinley and Delia (Jones) Brinegar.
She was a homebody, who liked to draw, and enjoyed taking care of her grandkids.

She is survived by one son, Stephen and LeeAnn Kiser of Mansfield; two grandchildren; two great grandchildren; and one brother, Ora Brinegar.

Along with her husband, William Kiser, Jr., who passed away in 1999, JoAnn was preceded in death by her parents; two brothers, Leroy Brinegar and Earl Brinegar; and three sisters, Christine Sparks, Pauline Duncan, and Elizabeth Culp.

A private memorial service will be held at a later date. Werner-Gompf Funeral Services, LTD. is assisting the family with the arrangements.

Online condolences may be made to the family at www.wernerfuneral.com

Mary Prock

jolenecappy — 2011-08-07 16:09:23Z

After 20+ years, I am finally getting around to adding the info I have. I wanted to share. I hope this information helps everyone.

Richard Jacks b abt 1739 in Baltimore County, MD

Married Mary Sparks abt 1768
They had
Nicholas, Guardian, Charity, Diana and Elizabeth

Then he LIVED WITH Mary Ann Prock, without divorcing Mary Sparks. (abt 1779)
They had
Rev. Richard, Solomon, Larkin, Jobe, Polly, Sally

Mary Ann Prock married 5 Dec 1768 first to Jacob Brinegar (1745-1783), then she was with Richard Jacks after Jocob died.

Cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, Volume 3
By Thomas Pollock Devereux, George Edmund

Dei? ex dem. of Jacob Brinegar et at.
r.

Gariand Chaetin.

Neither party to a deed of bargain and sale is estopped to show, thaone of the bargainors was a feme tole, although the deed recites thai she was covert.

Ejectment, tried at the last circuit, at Rowan, before his Honor Judge Swain.

The lessors of the plaintiff claimed as heirs at law of Mary Brinegar : the defendant under a deed of bargain and sale from the same Mary Brinegar, which purported to have been executed by her under the name of Mary Jacks, jointly with a second husband, Richard Jacks; and the only question was as to the validity of this deed. No privy examination of the feme had been taken; hut Oie defendant offered to prove, that in fact no valid mar

i iage subsisted at its execution, between Bichard Jacks Jvn 1831. aud Marti Brinegar, as Jacks then had a wife living, to whom he had" been married before his pretended marriage Bn"1i8** with Mary Brinegar. The lessors of the plaintiff ob- Cmmx. jected to this testimony, insisting that if the defendant claimed under a deed, which recited a marriage between Richard Jacks and Mary Brinegar, he was estopped to> deny that marriage. His Honor admitted the evidence, and the existence, at the execution of the deed, of the former marriage of Jacks* being clearly established, a verdict was returned for the defendant, and the plaintiff' appealed.

Winston, for the plaintiff, contended, 1st, That a marriage de facto drew after it all the legal consequences of a marriage de jure, and cited Morris v. Miller, (4 Bur. 2057) Dirt v. Barlow (Doug. 170) Alleynev. Grey (2'Sa/fc. 437) S. C. (Comberback 131.) 2d. That the defendant was estopped to deny that Mary Jacks was, & feme covert, and cited Norwood v. Stevenson (^nd.227) Co. Lit. s. 374, 230, 231, a. Com. Dig, Estoppel, A 2. •

A'ash, contra, insisted that the defendant, by, accept-. ing the deed executed by Mary Brinegar, under the name of Mary Jacks, as the wife of Richard Jacks, was not, stopped to show that she was a/ eine sole, and cited xMoore v. Willis (2 Hawks 558) Co. Lit. 13S, 6. 3 Thomas Co, 431. 2 do. 415. Com. Dig. Estoppel, C. E. 3. James v. London (Cro. Eliz. 37) Brereton v. Evans (do. 700) Buncombe v. Wingfield (Hob 254.) 1 Thorn. Co, 133*. 10 Fiji. Ab. 455.

•

HennEBsoif, Chief-Justice.—Recitals in a deed are estoppels when they are of the essence of the contract; A party to a, that is, where unless the facts recited exist, the contract topped by s it is presumed, would not have been made. As if A re- recital, unless^ cites, that he is seized in fee of certain lands, which he (,e the moving bargains and sells in fee. He is estopped to deny that cause of the exehe is seised in fee, for without such seisin, it is fair to deed, presume that the contract would not have been made. But if the recital be that he is seised in fee by purchase from C, here neither the bargainor nor bargainee is stopped from averriug and proving, that he is seised by

1

Jvn» 1831. purchase from D, unless it appear, that the seisin in fee ^^^""K by purchase from C was part of the contract, and withv. out which it would not have been made. For ordinarily Qhaffi*. the seisin only is of the essence of the contract, and how and from whom derived are but circumstances. So of every other recital. And this distinction reconciles the many apparent contradictions in the books, some declaring that recitals arc estoppels, and others that they are not In the case under consideration, that the feme was the wife of Jacks was not of the essence of the contract. It formed no part of it It was a mere circumstance of description, more unfavorable to the defendant, or rather the bargainee, than if-she had been sole. For itsolc. the deed was effectual by scaling and delivery. If she was covert, her private examination was necessary to make it her deed. In truth, her coverture was a fact, for which the bargainee neither gave nor received auy thing. Nor did he on that account receive any thing by the deed, which he would not have received, if she had been sole. Neither did it form the basis, nor in any manner move or conduce to the contract It is therefore mere matter of e vidence, and like all other evidence may be rebutted by contrary proof. The evidence therefore, that Jacks had another wife living at the time of the marriage, disproving the recital, was properly admitted.

But the case does not rest upon general reasoning. If A. S. by her deed, reciting that she is a feme covert, when in truth she is a feme sole, grants an annuity, it is a good grant for that is but a void recital, although the grantee had not put it in his writ; and it cannot be a c.inclusion to him, when he shows the deed. (Viner's Jib. J)/, s. & pi. 11. Perkins s. 40.) So if a feme covert, reciting by her deed that she is a feme sole, grant an annuity, this a void grant and she shall not be concluded by thisTccital. (Perkins 41, note.)

The other position taken by the plaintiff's counsel, that a husband de facto, embracing the case of Jacks, in. the present instance, is entitled to all the rights of a husband dejure, and the wife subject to all the disahililieaotafemetaroert, leads, I think, to consequences, which Jtn»nl83I.

make the proposition/eZo de se. It gives all the rights of a

husband, both to the person and the property of any wo- „.

man whom he may either deceive or persuade to have the Ciumir.

marriage ceremony performed between them; and all at the

same, time, thereby investing him with marital rights over

one hundred women. It cannot be so. The cases bear

the counsel out only in this ; (which is reasonable :) that where the lmi

in all but a few cases, perhaps onlv in cases of crim. con. !,a.nd s"e?foran 1 1 injury to his ma

and those which affect the husband in his conjugal rights, rital rights, he an actual legal marriage need not be proven. In those ^lenXzTtion'rrt" oases it -will not do to infer a marriage from circum- the marriage, stances, as long cohabitation, or the like. But in other cases, a marriage may be inferred from those circumstances. In cases of the latter kind, "never united in legal matrimony" is a bad plea; because it draws the But in those question from the courts of common law to the ecclesiastical courts, which require proof of an actual marriage, ^eisnot a procelebrated according to the forms of the church. ETiftlrn^ fi^■ Whereas, if left to be tried on the fact of marriage, it cireumstances, will then be tried upon such proofs as the party may offer, viz: either proof of an actual marriage, or , proof of long cohabitation. It is not to be inferred from this distinction, that courts of common law will sanction a marriage, by giving to the husband the marital rights, where it is shown that he is entirely incapable of contracting marriage, from any cause, as from having a wife living at the time; aKho' the second marriage is attempted to be proven, by showing that the marriage ceremony was actually performed ; or by showing a cohabitation and leaving it to be inferred. Whatever may be the effects of such a marriage, whether actually proven or inferred from cohabitation and the like, as to the acts of the woman whom the man calls his wife, in regard to the rights of others, I am satisfied, it confers on him no rights, and imposes on her no disabilities.

Den Et_ Dem. Brinegar V. Chaffin.

[:j Devebeui Law, 108.)

Recitals In Deed— When Parties Not Estopped Bt.—Recitals in a deed are estoppels when they are of the essence of the contract; but the parties to a bargain and salo deed are not estopped to show that one of the bargainors was a feme-sole, although the deed recites that she was a feme-covert.

Ejectment, tried at the last circuit at Rowan. The lessors of the plaintiff claimed as heirs at law of Mary Brinegar, and the defendant claimed under a bargain and Halo deed from the same Mary Brinegar, which purported to have been executed by her under tho name of Mary Jacks, jointly with a second husband, Richard Jacks. The only question was as to the validity of this deed. There was no privy examination of the fema taken; but the defendant offered to prove that no valid marriage, at the time of its execution, subsisted between the grantors, as Jacks had a wire living at the time of his pretended marriage with 'Mary Brinegar. The lessors of the plaintiff objected to this testimony, on the ground that if tho defendant claimed under a deed which recited a marriage, he was estopped to deny that marriage. The judge admitted the evidence; and the existence, at the date of the execution of the deed, of the former marriage of Jacks, being clearly established, a verdict was returned for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

Winston, for the plaintiff. 1. A marriage dc facto draws aftei it all the legal consequences of a marriage dejure: Morris v. Mater, 4 Bur. 2057; Birtv. Barlow, Doug. 170; Allojnev. Grey, 2 Salk. 437; S. C., Comberback, 131. 2. The defendant was estopped to deny that Mary Jacks was a feme-covert: Norwood v. Stevenson, And. 227; Co. Lit. s. 374, 230, 231, a; Com. Dig., Estoppel, A. 2.

Nash, for the defendant. The defendant, by accepting the deed was not estopped to show that Mary Jacks was a femesole: Moore v. Willis, 2 Hawks. 558; Co. Lit. 133, b; 3 Co. 431; 2 Id. 415; Com. Dig., Estoppel, C. E. 3; Jamesy. London, Cro. Eliz. 37; Brereton v. Evans, Id. 700; Duncombc v. Wingfteld, Hob. 254; 1 Co. 133; 10 Vin. Abr. 455.

Henderson, C. J. Recitals in a deed are estoppels when they are of the essence of the contract; that is, where, unless the facts recited exist, the contract, it is presumed, would not have been made. As if A. recites that he is seised in fee of certain lands, which he bargains and sells in fee. He is estopped to deny that he is seised in fee, for without such seisin, it is fail to presume that the contract would not have been made. Bot if the recital be that ho is seised in fee by purchase from C, here neither the bargainor nor bargainee is estopped from averring and proving that he is seised by purchase from D., unless it appear that the seisin in fee by purchase from C. was part of the contract, and without which it would not have been made. For ordinarily tho seisin only is of the essence of the contract, and how and from whom derived are but circumstances. So of every other recital. And this distinction reconciles tho many apparent contradictious in the books, some declaring that recitals are estoppels, and others that they are not. In the case under consideration, that the feme was the wife of Jacks was not of the essence of the contract. It formed no part of it. It was a mere circumstance of description, more unfavorable to the defendant- or rather the bargaineo, than if she had been sole. For if sole, the deed was effectual by sealing and delivery. If she was covert, her private examination was necessary to make it her deed. In truth, her coverture was a fact, for which tho bargainee neither gave nor received anything. Nor did he on that account receive anything by the deed, which he would not have received if she had been soh'. Neither did it form tho basis, nor in any manner move cr conduce to the contract. It is therefore mere matter of evidence, and like all other evidence may be rebutted by contrary proof. The evidence, therefore, that Jacks had another wife living at the time of the marriage, disproving the recital, was properly admitted.

But the case does not rest upon general reasoning. If A. S. by her deed, reciting that she is a feme-covert, when in truth she is a feme-sole, grants an annuity, it is a good grant, for that is but a void recital, although the grantee had not put it in his writ; and it can not be a conclusion to him, when he shows thedeed: Vin. Abr. M., sec. 8, pl. 11; Perk. sec. 40. So if a feme-covert, reciting by her deed that she is a feme-sole, grant an annuity, this is a void grant, and she shall not be concluded by this recital: Perk. 41, note.

The other position taken by the plaintiff's counsel, that a husband de faclo, embracing the case of Jacks, in tho present instance, is entitled to all the rights of a husband dejure, and the wife subject to all the disabilities of a feme-covert, leads, I think, to consequences which make the proposition felo de se. It gives all the rights of a husband, both to the person and the property of any woman whom he may either deceive or persuade to have the marriage ceremony performed between them; and all nt the same time, thereby investing him with marital rights over one hundred women. It can not be so. The cases bear the couneel out only in this (which is reasonable), that in all but a few cases, perhaps only in cases of crim. con., and those which affect tho husband in his conjugal rights, an actual legal marriage need not be proven. In those cases it will not do to infer a marriage from circumstances, as long cohabitation, or tho like. But in other cases, a marriage may be inferred from these circumstances. In cases of the latter kind, " never united in legal matrimony" is a bad plea; because it draws the question from the courts of common law to the ecclesiastical courts, which require proof of an actual marriage, celebrated according to the forms of the church. Whereas, if left u> bo tried on tho fact of marriage, it will then be tried upon such proofs as the party may offer, viz., either proof of au actual marriage, or proof of long cohabitation. It is not to bo inferred from this distinction, that courts of common law will sanction a marriage, by giving to tho husband the marital rights, where it is shown that ho is entirely incapable of contracting marriage, from any cause, as from having a wife living at the time; although tho second marriage is attempted to bo proved, by showing that the marriage ceremony was actually performed; or by showing cohabitation, and leaving it to be inferred. Whatever may be the effects of such a marriage, whether actually proven or inferred from cohabitation and the like, as to the acts the woman whom the man calls his wife, in regard to the rights of others, I am satisfied, it confers on him no rights, and imposes on her no disabilities. Per Cukiam. Judgment affirmed.

Cited in Gatliings v. William*, 5 Ired. Law, 494, in support of the position that bigamy repels the right to administer on the estate of husband or wife: or to the distributive share of the decedent's estate; or to the acquisition of the personal property of the wife by the husband.

Estoppel Bt Recitals In Deed.—A party who has admitted a fact in his deed, is estopped not only from disputing the deed, but every fact whidi it recites: Stow v. Wyse, I8 Am. Due. 99; see, also, on this subject, note to Graff v. Cattleman, 16 Id. 754.

BRINEGAR Barry L - Vietnam Wall section 5W

t42Vietnam_ParkerCoTX — 2011-05-30 16:04:25Z

BRINEGAR Barry L - Vietnam Wall section 5W

Honor our Veterans. This is one of many photographs of the Vietnam Memorial Wall in Parker Co, TX. Feel free to use this picture for your personal records. This is one of the 221,609 photos free at http://teafor2.com where they are listed in order by state(Texas), county(Parker), cemetery(Vietnam) and Surname.

If you know more about this person please reply here instead of contacting me because this is not my family.

Re: The Brinegar Family of Kentucky

bgpar — 2011-04-29 20:53:11Z

I think John and Rachel Brinegar might be my GGGGrandparens.
I think my line comes from their Son James Thomas Brinegar that married Charlotte Temple Francis. They had Cafina Belle Brinegar, which I haven't proved it yet, but I think Cafina might be my GreatGrandmother. My GGrandmother went by Belle, but things are sure pointing to the fact that she was James Thomas Brinegar's Daughter. I have just been checking this out the last couple of years. Belle married Elza Beckett Garner.
Hope you get this posting, as most of the postings are older. if not maybe it will help some one.
bgpar

Re: Brinager/Baker, Carter Co. & Greenup Co. KY

EARLANDJOFORJESUS — 2011-01-28 01:40:14Z

LILLY WAY BRINEGAR WAS MY GREAT GRANDMOTHER. IHAVE MORE
INFO. PLEASE CONTACT ME. MY NAME IS EARL DAVID BRINEGAR.

Re: Asbury and Brineger connection

Dreamgrdn — 2011-01-09 05:00:00Z

The Nancy E. Asbury listed with Thomas on the 1870 Census in Tazewell, Va is Nancy Emily Brinegar, a daughter of Thomas Brinegar and his wife Sarah. Nancy Emily Brinegar was married to John C Asbury (born about 1841- died before 1880). Children of Nancy Brinegar and John Asbury are Martha, Thomas, Sarah, Daniel and James. You can find Nancy and John Asbury on a 1860 Census record living in Western District, Tazewell, Virginia. In 1880, Nancy is listed as widowed and living with her mother.

I don't know Sarah's sir name.

Thomas Brinegar's parents are Jacob Brinegar (1778-1844) and Nancy Frazier (1780-1830).

Re: Richard Brinegar, son of Grace Bingham

Dreamgrdn — 2010-08-12 03:54:32Z

Thanks!

I'll contact you through email.

~ Chris

Asbury and Brineger connection

AsburyThorneJones — 2010-08-07 07:22:38Z

In the 1880 census it list Thomas W. Asbury Nancy E. Asbury living with Sally Brineger and Mary Brineger. In the 1870 Census there's a Thomas Bringer, with Mary E. Bringer, Sarah Bringer, Thomas W. Asberry, Nancy E, Asberry in Tazewell Va.
Thomas Bringer is listed as being born in North Carolina. I have a few question that someone may have the information. What was the name of the father and mother of Thomas Brineger? What was Sarah/Sally's sir name? Is Nancy E. Asbury their child???

Tammie Asbury Yarborough

Asbury and Brineger connection

AsburyThorneJones — 2010-08-07 07:17:46Z

In the 1880 census it list Thomas W. Asbury Nancy E. Asbury living with Sally Brineger and Mary Brineger. In the 1870 Census there's a Thomas Bringer, with Mary E. Bringer, Sarah Bringer, Thomas W. Asberry, Nancy E, Asberry in Tazewell Va.
Thomas Bringer is listed as being in North Carolina. I'm thinking they are one and the same. I have a few question that someone may have the information. Who were Thomas Brineger parents, What is Sarah/Sally's sir name, and is Nancy E. Asbury their child???

Re: James "Bose" Brinegar

jema07 — 2010-07-19 10:37:17Z

Hey Chris,

Is this an article on his mother? There are brothers, Dillard and James. She married a Dunaway. Remember the newspaper clipping where a Dunaway shot his half brother Dillard? Interesting lady :-)

http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~jbawden/hoover/photo...

Re: Thomas Brinegar

pamela_baughman — 2010-07-17 23:57:55Z

No -- that's a whole new name to me.

Re: NC Brinegars

buddhapup — 2010-07-17 14:41:40Z

My direct Brinegar line goes back to the 1650's in Germany to Ralph Pruitt B: 1801 Wilkes, North Carolina, USA
D:1860 Wilkes, North Carolina, United States and Sarah Brinegar B: 1808 Wilkes, NC, USA D:1879 Wilkes, NC, USA.
Jacob Brinegar/Mary Prock are my gr-gr-gr-gr grandparents and so forth.

I am looking for more information on the NC Brinegars and also Ralph and Sarah's son Major Pruitt(Pruett).

I was wondering if any NC or earlier Brinegars would like to share family tree information with me.

Re: James "Bose" Brinegar

Dreamgrdn — 2010-07-17 12:43:10Z

Thanks so much for the article!! Greatly appreciated!

~ Chris

Re: James "Bose" Brinegar

jema07 — 2010-07-17 07:50:08Z

http://kdl.kyvl.org/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=ricnews;cc=r...

I hope that link works. It is an article in the Richmond (KY) Climax:

Terrible Tragedy Near Irvine
News of a terrible tragedy above Irvine was brought here Saturday. According to the report Court Dunaway waylaid his wife and shot twice at her with a shotgun, the powder burning her face severely. He was prompted by jealousy of a half brother, Bose Brinegar. After the attempt to kill his wife he fled, and later is is said he killed Dillard Brineagr, a brother of Bose Brinegar and a half brother of himself. Still later word was received that Dunaway, being closely pursued, by a posse bent on lynching him, had killed himself with his own shotgun.

http://kdl.kyvl.org/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=ricnews;cc=r...

http://kdl.kyvl.org/static/news/ricnews/ricnews_KUK-ric19011...

All should link to same scan of original newspaper, but I wanted to be sure at least one of them worked :-)

Re: Thomas Brinegar

jema07 — 2010-07-17 00:28:05Z

Hey Chris :-)

I found;
Bellzora P.(Anderson) Brinegar b- 7 May 1861 MO, d-4 Mar 1910
father - Thomas David Jr. Brinegar b- 8 Oct 1802 KY
mother - Elizabeth Hannah Wharton b-29 Nov 1835 MO

1870 United States Federal Census;
Eliabeth was head of household at age 46, Louisa G age9, Bel P age8, Robert S age4...

Thomas David Jr-b 8 Oct 1802 KY, d-22 Apr 1866 MO (of inguires)
his first marriage was to Susanna Jane Daugherty (10 kids)
his second marriage was Martha Jane Brynt? (no offspring)
his third marriage was to Eliz Hannah Wharton (5 children)

Re: John Adam Brinegar or Brinigar

jema07 — 2010-07-17 00:04:46Z

With the info I had:

John Adam b- Rowam Co NC D- 29 Jan 1861 Granby MO
his father - Adam Jr. Brinegar b-1745 prob PA VA or NC
his mother - Margaret b-1765 Salsbery NC
Spouse - Agnes A Brayton b- 1816 Vermont
married 12 Nov 1844 Wisconsin

to go further back;
Adam Jr's father is Hans Adam Brinegar b-1726 in Germany
Adam Jr's mother is Elizabeth McGance b-1726 in Germany

Tracie (Theresa) Stanka. In 1880 in MO, she was living with her dad - Anton Stanka, her mom Theresa Stanka and brother named Anton Stanka b-Jun1849 (Parents named children after them).
Anton was found living in MO, living as a brother to the head of house in later years. Household members: Grace Brinegar age 42, Martha J Brinegar 14, Cornelia Brinegar age 12, and Anton Stanka age 50.

Re: Richard Brinegar, son of Grace Bingham

marjijane — 2010-02-18 17:04:49Z

Richard Mac Brinegar Born 28 Jul 1929 Bell County KY
Married Sheldon (living) 6 Dec 1950
Three Children - all living
Divorced 1954
Married details unknown California
One Child - living
Divorced - date unknown
Died 17 Nov 1993 VA Hospital Portland, Multnomah, OR

Elizabeth Brinegar
Born 5 Jun 1928 Bell County KY
Married Mason
Died 9 Dec 1995 Oak Harbor, Ottawa, OH

John M. Brinegar
born about 1895
Died 1951 VA Hospital Dearborn, MI

Grace E. Bingham
Born 25 Sep 1906
Second marriage to St.Bernard details unknown
Died 8 Aug. 1997 Toledo, Lucas, OH

Richard's oldest son is my husband. You may contact me at marjijane@gmail.com

Re: Plowman

plowman_paul — 2010-02-10 13:56:21Z

My Plowmans were in Wigginton from the 1500s to 1828 when they came to the USA. Branton green is only a short distance away but the plowman name seems to go back to the 1500s in Branton Green. I have corresponded with several Plowmans in your line that decinded from William Whitehead Plowman. I knew Lottie went to Australia and I visited with Plowmans in Wigginton who were William Whiteheads descindents. I didn't know they tied in with the Plowmans in Kentucky. I feel relatively sure that our plowmans probably tie together but it is probably in the 1500s or before.

Re: Plowman

robertjohncook — 2010-02-10 09:51:51Z

My great great grandfather was George Plowman b1812 at Branton Green, d1891 at Great Ouseburn, Yorkshire, England. He married Margaret b1817 at Marton, d1897 at Great Ouseburn. They had three children Mary Ann b1849, Robert b1856 and William Whitehead Plowman b1860 at High Dunsford. He married Hannah Bickerdike (b June 26, 1863 at Wigginton). They had ten children. The eldest was Lottie b Nov 1, 1884 at Skelton She went on to marry Herbert Naylor and they were my mother's parents. William and Hannah's other children were George(b1886), Gordon (1888), Fred (1891), Joe (1893), Irene Millicent (1897) James William (1899), John Herbert (1901), Cyrus (1903) and Ethel Mary Bickerdike (1908). More details available

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Ivygarden_1 — 2010-02-07 21:33:14Z

Our cousin, Cathy Lanham-Gillihan (Mother is Hazel Brinegar-Lanham), lives in Idaho and she did a beautiful job of incorporating family photos onto a disc and providing our family tree as far back to Thomas B. Brinegar, Jr. (KY) and wife Rachel. He was married two or three times, and family history thereafter. He owned land in MO near the Missouri river and married his last wife in Holt Co. After Thomas died, his wife Elizabeth Hannah Wharton returned to Holt Co. with their children. According to the tree info. I have, our direct line lived in MO and Nebraska, and scattered west.
Do your folks have reunions? I found out about a year ago that my Grandfather's side (Rupert) have a huge reunion every 4th of July in Pennsylvania. I am trying to get some family together and try to attend...

Re: Brinegar Cabin

bgpar — 2010-02-02 03:29:11Z

Thank you, yes I have a picture of the headstone and noticed it said Belle B, but a few years ago I found E B Garner and Belles marriage listed on familysearch.org and it states Belle C.
I have a copy of her marriage License and it states Belle C.
Your are right they have put Belle B on the headstone and the B is probably for Brinegar. Although her Daughter did the death certificate and she didn't put a middle name for Belle. It had a - for the middle name.
Betty Parks

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Dreamgrdn — 2010-02-01 20:25:08Z

Found Belle on a Yukon Cemetery listing.

http://www.okcemeteries.net/canadian/yukon/yukong.htm

She is listed as Belle B. Garner. A lot of women used their maiden name as their middle name after they were married...or used the first letter of their maiden name as a middle initial. This could explain the "B" as Belle's middle initial. - it's for Brinegar.

Re: Brinegar Cabin

bgpar — 2010-02-01 16:31:18Z

Chris, Thank you so much, Charolotte and Thomas are the one I had a feeling that might be her parents. I haven't found Belle listed in any of the 3 books I bought at Osceola MO. but I will look again and maybe find somthing on Charlotte.
May have to go back to Osceola and do more research. I was raining pretty hard and the Historical Society was closed the day I was there.
Betty Parks

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Dreamgrdn — 2010-02-01 16:20:17Z

Laura,

I currently live in near Virginia Beach, Virginia, but grew up in Maryland.

My direct line of Brinegar's left NC for West Virginia in the early 1850's, with a few married children/siblings remaining in North Carolina. My great grandparents spent most of their lives living in West Virginia, living for a period of time with my grandparents in Maryland (Montgomery County area). My Brinegar mother was born and raised in Maryland.

Most of our Brinegar's are in Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina.

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Dreamgrdn — 2010-02-01 15:02:56Z

Betty ........

We had posted back and forth on another thread about these same people. I've copied and pasted those posts here so others can follow along. This seems to be more evidence that the Belle Brinegar that married a Garner points to Cafina B. Brinegar that I found as a daughter of James Thomas Brinegar and Charlotte Temple Frances.

THIS WAS YOUR ORIGINAL POST.....AND MINE FOLLOWS.....

RE: Brinegar or Brenegar
BettyParks57 (View posts) Posted: 23 Mar 2006 1:18AM
Classification: Query
Surnames: Brenegar - Garner - Grigsby - Mulkey - Reeves - McGee - Garland - Westenhaver
Is there anyone that has any info on a Belle C. Brenegar (Family Search may have spelled Brenegar wrong) I found Belle Brenegar in the Iowa census, she was single. I don't have the year with me right now. I found a Belle C. Brenegar married E. B. Garner July 16, 1883 St. Clair, MO. This Belle C. and E. B. may be my Great Grand Parents. Belle C. is buied in Yukon, OK died 1955. E. B. is buried in Chelsea, OK.
I was researching a John Rogers and found a Thomas Jefferson Brinegar married Charlotte Temple Francis born Mar 4, 1851 in Collins, Saint Clair Co. MO. I am wondering if Belle C. and Thomas Jefferson might be related, since they were both in St. Clair MO.
Any one have any idea's?

THIS IS MY REPLY TO YOU.

Re: RE: Brinegar or Brenegar
Dreamgrdn (View posts) Posted: 30 Jan 2010 9:50PM
Classification: Query
Surnames: Brinegar, Francis, Garner, Handy
Betty,

This may be a better hit to your other post that I replied to.

According to my info and tree, Charlotte Temple Frances married James Thomas Brinegar (I don't have him as Thomas Jefferson Brinegar), born Sep 1843 in Linn County, Missouri; died 22 Apr 1903 in Pulaski County Arkansas. He married Charlotte on 24 March 1868. They had a daughter listed on 1880 census as Cafina B. Brinegar, born about 1871 in Missouri; in census they are living in Collins, Saint Clair County, Missouri. Charlotte is living with her parents on this census. Other children of hers are Alice, age 7, George, age 5 and Edward, age 2. She is listed as married but her husband is not listed with them. On 14 Oct 1889, Charlotte marries Miles Jasper Handy in Bolivar, Polk County, Missouri.

The next census I found for Charlotte's first husband, James Thomas Brinegar is 1900. He is listed as widowed, living in the W. B. National Military Home for Disabled Veterans in Delaware, Leavenworth County, Kansas. He died on 22 Apr 1903 in Pulaski County, Arkansas.

Cafina B. Brinegar could be Belle C. Brinegar. With her birth year about 1871 according to 1880, this is a close match to the census records I found for Belle after she married Elzy Garner.

Both James Thomas Brinegar and Charlotte Temple Francis were born in Missouri. Charlotte was actually born in Collins, St Clair County, Missouri.

Siblings of Cafina are James, born about 1869; Mary Jane Alice, born 28 Jun 1871; George Washington, born 2 Feb 1876; Edward T., born about 1878; May born about 1880 and half-sibling, Charles Boyd Handy, born 19 Aug 1885.

~ Chris

Re: Brinegar Cabin

bgpar — 2010-02-01 02:32:10Z

Chris & Laura, This is the Certificate of Death for Belle (Middle name not listed) Garner. Usual Residence Bethany OK Oklahoma Co. 416 SE Main St. death April 28, 1955. Female, white, widowed, birth July 28 1869, Age 85, Housewife, Birthplace Collins MO, Citizen USA, Fathers name Thomas Brinegar, Mothers Maiden Name Belle Brinegar, Informant Mrs. W M Johnson ? Yukon OK. This was Belle's Daughter Mary Lee Johnson that signed the DC) Belle Died from Heart Disease. (Mothers Maiden name, I was wondering if Mary Had put in her Mother's maiden name, instead of Belle's Mother's Maiden name?)

OBIT:
Mrs. Belle Garner Yukon- Private Services for Belle 85 of Bethany who died Friday at Deaconess hospital, will be at 1:30 pm Sunday in the Turner Funeral Chapel here with buriel in Yukon Cem. Mrs. Garner was born July 28, 1869 in Collins MO. and came to OK in 1898 and settlement in Chelsea OK. She lived in Arapaho and for the past five years has been a resident of Bethany. She was a member of the Baptist Church.
Survivors include three Daughters. Mrs. Pearl Duke, 121 NW 29 OK City OK, Mrs Marry Lee Johnson, Yukon OK. Mrs Violet Preston, Englewood CO., a Son John F Garner, Olathe KS. five Gransons, 2 Great Grandchildren and two Great Great Grandchildren.

Marriage License: Collins MO ST Clair Co. between E B Garner and Belle C. Garner under 18 years of age. The written consent of Mrs Charlotte Brinegar is on file in my office. Written my hand as Recorder with the seal of office hereto affixed at my office in the city of Oseceola, the 8th day of June 1883. (Dan?) T Morgan. This is to certify that the undersigned, a JP did at Residence of Jack Gass or Guss in said Co on the 16 day of July 1883 unite in Marriage the above named persons.
Filed this 20th day of July A D 1883.

Thanks for getting me on the ball, guess I hadn't read this Marriage License very good, as it states Mrs. Charlotte Brinegar, signing for consent. Do you think that Charlotte could be the Mother of Belle?
Betty Parks

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Ivygarden_1 — 2010-01-31 21:09:22Z

Hi Chris and Betty:
I am looking at a copy of the Brinegar family tree and it shows that Thomas was born in KY on Oct 8, 1802 and died on April 22, 1866. He was beaten by "Sayhawker's." (I don't know who they are) Regarding Bellzora and Louisa Victoria, they are Sisters.
Thomas and Elizabeth Hannah Wharton were married June 19, 1853 and had 5 children. She is Thomas' second wife. 1. Mary Ellen b. Dec. 13, 1854; 2. Louisa Victoria. Our info. on her is sketchy,only having her death in 1960; 3.Bellzora was born (like you have) May 7, 1861. We have no record of her death; 4. William T. only info. b. 1862 d.1872; 5. Robert Lee b. 1865, no record of his death.

Thomas was first married to Susan Jane Daughtery in May 1823 in Estill County, KY. Susan was b. 1801 and d. 1850-51. No other info. on her. They had 10 kids!
If you like I will give what info. I have on them.

I think that I already shared how I am mixed in with the Brinegar's to Chris. Betty, I live in Seattle. My name is Laura Rupert-Needham. (My Father is Norman W. Rupert. His mother is Annabelle Brinegar).

Will both you please give me your names and where you live, etc.? I really love finding and learning of family. Presently we have Brinegar's in Idaho, Oregon, Washington, California, and Arizona.

I need to go for now. I hope to hear from you in the near future.
Sincerely,
Laura (Ivygarden@aol.com)

Re: Brinegar Cabin

bgpar — 2010-01-31 03:59:56Z

Thanks for the help. I have Belle obit, I will get it and email it to you. I have a picture, but it in scrapbooks in family tree and I don't know how to send it to you. Maybe I can find some one here to help with it. The Pastor of the Church here is really good with computers, maybe he can help me.
My connection is to the Garners. Belle and Elza's Son Walter is my Grandfather. He was killed in Chelsea OK Rogers Co. We think he is buried where he was killed.
B Parks

Re: RE: Brinegar or Brenegar

bgpar — 2010-01-31 03:27:25Z

Thanks Chris for helping me. I have a picture of her headstone in Yukon OK. and it states 1869-1955. I went to Collins MO St Clair, went on to Oscelola MO the county seat, did not find anything on her, but did find several Brinegars in the cem books. I bought 3 of the books, but haven't had time to review them. I also feel like she is connected to the family you mentioned. Maybe Belle was a nick name. I did look at the picture and the C looks like it could be a B. Her marriage on familysearch.org says Belle B., but it could have been put in wrong. I will keep researching. Thanks again for the help. I will appreciate any thing you come up with.
B Parks

Re: Mary Jane Alice BRINEGAR

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-31 02:59:27Z

Anna, Who are your grandparents...the generation before Verna Gosnell and Marion Harvey Brown and after Mary Jane Alice Brinegar.

~ Chris

Re: Mary Jane Alice BRINEGAR

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-31 02:55:41Z

Does anyone have any info on Mary Jane Alice Brinegar's sister Cafina B. Brinegar? Trying to see if this is Belle C. "Brenegar" that married Elzy Garner.

Re: RE: Brinegar or Brenegar

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-31 02:50:29Z

Betty,

This may be a better hit to your other post that I replied to.

According to my info and tree, Charlotte Temple Frances married James Thomas Brinegar (I don't have him as Thomas Jefferson Brinegar), born Sep 1843 in Linn County, Missouri; died 22 Apr 1903 in Pulaski County Arkansas. He married Charlotte on 24 March 1868. They had a daughter listed on 1880 census as Cafina B. Brinegar, born about 1871 in Missouri; in census they are living in Collins, Saint Clair County, Missouri. Charlotte is living with her parents on this census. Other children of hers are Alice, age 7, George, age 5 and Edward, age 2. She is listed as married but her husband is not listed with them. On 14 Oct 1889, Charlotte marries Miles Jasper Handy in Bolivar, Polk County, Missouri.

The next census I found for Charlotte's first husband, James Thomas Brinegar is 1900. He is listed as widowed, living in the W. B. National Military Home for Disabled Veterans in Delaware, Leavenworth County, Kansas. He died on 22 Apr 1903 in Pulaski County, Arkansas.

Cafina B. Brinegar could be Belle C. Brinegar. With her birth year about 1871 according to 1880, this is a close match to the census records I found for Belle after she married Elzy Garner.

Both James Thomas Brinegar and Charlotte Temple Francis were born in Missouri. Charlotte was actually born in Collins, St Clair County, Missouri.

Siblings of Cafina are James, born about 1869; Mary Jane Alice, born 28 Jun 1871; George Washington, born 2 Feb 1876; Edward T., born about 1878; May born about 1880 and half-sibling, Charles Boyd Handy, born 19 Aug 1885.

~ Chris

Re: Thomas Brinegar

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-31 02:13:00Z

Do you or anyone else have any info on Robert's sister Bellzora Brinegar including sources?

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-31 01:11:42Z

Betty -

I've done some poking around...the only Belle/Bell Brinegar I have found with father of Thomas was Bellzora Brinegar...like the one Ivygarden mentioned. Several people have her on their trees but they also have a death date for her of 4 Mar 1910 in Craig, Moffat, Colorado....I even have this on my tree that I must have gotten it from someone else...but no one has a source for this death date.

I found a 1900 Census and 1910 Census with Belle and her husband and children. Those census has both Belle's parents born in Missouri. The Thomas Brinegar with Bellzora as a daughter was born in Kentucky but he died in Missouri. The wife of Thomas is Elizabeth Hannah Wharton and she was born in Missouri. The dates of birth don't appear to make her a match, census records can be so unreliable. Info I have for Bellzora is she was born 7 May 1861 in Holt County, Missouri...but I don't have a source for this and neither does anyone else...can't remember where I got it. I do have her on an 1870 census with her mother and siblings and it has her age as 8. Thomas died in 1866. Since he died when Bellzora was so young, she may have thought her father was born in Missouri and didn't know he was born in Kentucky.

The 1900 and 1910 Census records are as follows:

1900 - Coo Wee Scoo Wee, Cherokee Nation, Indian Territory....Elza Garner, born Oct 1857, 42, married 17 years, birth states Kentucky/Tennessee/Tennessee....Belle, born Jun 1869, 30, 6/6 children, Missouri/Missouri/Missouri....Mary, dau, born Dec 1886, 13, Missouri...Ollie, dau, Jul 1889, 10, Missouri....Pearl, dau, Sep 1891, 8, Missouri.....Walter, son, Jun 1894, 6, Missouri.....Fannie, dau, Aug 1895, 4, Missouri.....Fair, son, Dec 1898, 1, Indian Territory.

1910 Census - Rider, Mayes County, Oklahoma
Elzy B Garner, 56, m2 marriage (meaning his second marriage), married 29 years, Kentucky/NC/VA.....Bell, wife, 40, m1 married (meaning first marriage), 9/8 children, Missouri/Missouri/Missouri.....Walter R, son, 15....Fannie, dau, 13.....Johnie F, son, 11, born Cherokee Nation (Oklahoma).....Jessie J, dau, 9, born Cherokee Nation (Oklahoma)....Violet, dau, 5 or 6 - hard to read, born Cherokee Nation (Oklahoma).

As far as Elzy Garner having been married prior to Belle. I found a for an Elzy B Garner married to Mary E Kinser. Mary was born about 1858 in Brownsville, Edmondson County, Kentucky and died Feb 1880, buried at Oak Hill Cemetery. They were married on 27 Jul 1877.

One of Bellzora's siblings, Louisa Victoria Brinegar...she is on several people's trees online. According to their records, she lived to be 103. Don't know that this info if reliable. Born 25 Jul 1856 in Holt, Missouri and died 20 Feb 1960 in Forsyth, North Carolina. They have her spouse as Enoch Winchester Jackson. Perhaps you could find an obituary on her and see if she mentions a sister named Bellzora or Bell and her married last name.

I'll keep poking and see what else I can find.

James "Bose" Brinegar

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-19 01:11:58Z

Looking for more information on James "Bose" Brinegar (born about 1866 in Kentucky, died 6 Jan 1935 in Estill County, Kentucky) and his children. Believe he was married to Alice Flynn, born about 1870 and had at least 2 children with her - first child - Dillard Brinegar, born 24 Apr 1896 in Estill County, KY, died 26 Sep 1933 in Clark County, KY; second child - Ellen Brinegar, born 4 Sep 1898 in KY, died 25 Jun 1986 in Irvine, Estill County, KY. Ellen married Pearl Abney (1896-1969).

A second wife of James "Bose" Brinegar is Susan, don't have a last name. He had 2 children with her. First child - Louis Brinegar, born about 1901 in Estill County, KY, died 24 Jul 1925 in Estill County, KY; second child - Willie Brinegar, born 29 May 1903 in KY, died Feb 1973 in Irvine, Estill County, KY.

Info I have is that James' son Louis was murdered by a gunshot wound. They never found out who did it. Louis is buried at Chestnut Stand Cemetery in Estill County according to his death certificate.

Looking for the wife and children of Louis. Could be a Vina Abney; children could be Algin, born about 1920; Virgle, born about 1922 and Mary, born about 1925.

Found a 1930 Census with Vina Brinegar, age 35, widowed, with these children listed and also Bose Brinegar, father-in-law, age 63, widowed.

Need sources to confirm info.

Any help appreciated.

~ Chris

Re: Brinegar Cabin

bgpar — 2010-01-16 01:17:37Z

Ch
ris I forgot to thank you for re-plying to help me.
I would appreciate any help you might be able to give me.
I went to Collins MO and the county seat Osceola MO. Found several Brinegars that were buried there, but nothing on Belle.
Thanks again
Betty Parks

Re: Brinegar Cabin

bgpar — 2010-01-16 01:10:08Z

Chris
This is the Obit:
Mrs. Belle Garner
Yukon-- Private services for Mrs. Belle Garner 85, of Bethany who died Fri at Deaconess Hospital, will be at 1:30 pm Sun in the Turner funeral chapel here with burial in Yukon cemetery.
Mrs. Garner was born July 28, 1869 in Collins MO and came to OK in 1898 and settled in Chelsea. She lived in Arapaho and for the past five years has been a resident of Bethany. She was a member of the Baptist church.
Survivors include three Daughters, Mrs Pearl Duke 121 NW 29th OK City; Mrs Mary Lee Johnson, Yukon, and Mrs Violet Preston, Englewood CO; a son John F. Garner Olathe, KS. five grandsons, 9 great grandchildren and two great-great grandchildren.
On one of the census I have the following children:
Jesse J, Violet, Mary Lee b Dec 1886, Ollie, Pearl b Sept 1891, Walter Ray Garner b 15 Jan 1894, Fannie b Aug 1895, John Fair b 18 Dec 1898 OK. d 25 Feb 1970 bur in Chelsea OK Rogers Co Dawes Cem. All the children except John were born in MO. My line comes from Walter Ray.
I ordered her death certicate and all it stated was her Father was Thomas. No dates or Mother listed.
Betty Parks

John Brinegar, son of William Brinegar & Susannah or Susan McKinney

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-15 16:44:29Z

Looking for more information on John Brinegar, born about 1876 in Estill County, Kentucky. Found an 1880 Census with him and his parents in Station Camp, Estill County, KY

William Brinegar, 53, KY/VA/VA
Susan, 28, KY/KY/KY
Delilah, 13
Daniel B., 11
William, 8
Sarah A, 6
John A., 4
Josiah, 3

Have on info on a spouse or children. Any help great appreciated!

~ Chris

Richard Brinegar, son of Grace Bingham

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-15 15:02:36Z

Looking for information on Richard M Brinegar and his mother Grace Bingham. Richard was born 28 July 1929 in Bell County, Kentucky. Grace also had a daughter, Elizabeth J Brinegar, born 5 June 1928 in Bell County, Kentucky. Also looking for their Brinegar father.

Price Brinegar, son of John Brinegar

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-15 14:35:03Z

I'm trying to identify this John Brinegar, the father of Price Brinegar. Price, born about 1904 in Kentucky, married Jennie Cain. Price and Jennie had at least one child, Kenneth L Brinegar. Kenneth Brinegar was born 7 Apr 1928 in Madison County, Kentucky. He died 17 Sep 1981 in Fayette County, Kentucky. Kenneth married Delores Thomason on 23 Jun 1973.

The mother of Price and wife of John is Laura L. John and Laura also had another child, named Laura, born about 1907 in Kentucky. I would love more info on her as well.

I have no further info. Sure could use some help.

Thanks,

Chris

Re: John Adam Brinegar

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-15 06:39:37Z

Info I have is the parents of your John Adam (never saw this middle name before) Brinegar are Adam Brinegar, Jr. born about 1745 in Rowan County, North Carolina, died 6 Nov 1816 in Clark County, Kentucky; and Margaret Wiley, born about 1770 in North Carolina, died about 1852 in Bath County, Kentucky. Siblings for John are Samuel, Margaret, Thomas, Nancy, Benjamin, Morgan, Mary and Wiley David.

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-15 02:20:21Z

Betty, do you know Belle's mother's name? Or a birth or death date for Thomas Brinegar? I might be able to help you.

~ Chris

Re: Brinegar Cabin

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-14 21:35:03Z

Ivygarden...so which is your dad...Edgar, Theodore, Harold or Norman...or perhaps I've missed a name. Can email me at Dreamgrdn@aol.com.

Love connecting to other Brinegars!

~ Chris

Re: sword

Dreamgrdn — 2010-01-12 19:21:49Z

Where did you obtain the sword from? Brinegar is my mother's maiden name. Would like to see a picture, if possible. What state are you located in? We have Brinegar's all over the US. Can email me at Dreamgrdn@aol.com

Thanks,

~ Chris

sword

mb638 — 2010-01-11 07:04:17Z

I have a sword with the name Brinegar on it. Can anyone give me a little history? or information

Re: Brinegar Information

wwbrinegar — 2009-11-19 23:02:43Z

I made a mistake in my email address. It is wwbrinegar@bresnan.net