Search for content in message boards

Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Posted: 19 Apr 2013 2:24AM GMT
Classification: Query
You said you would address concerns about the relationship calculator back in February. You did change some things but you did not address the often-mentioned complaint that displaying the calculated relationship was no longer optional, as it had been in the past. You did not respond to my query asking you to explain why it was so difficult to restore this option. Do you intend to do more with the relationship calculator or not? If not, I would appreciate being informed of that. If you are continuing to work with it, I would appreciate being told that also. Thanks.

Re: Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Posted: 20 Apr 2013 12:33AM GMT
Classification: Query
MZashin

3 DIFFERENT threads on the SAME issue ARE NOT likely to encourage Mr Lawless to give you the details your heart desires.

Re: Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Posted: 20 Apr 2013 1:04AM GMT
Classification: Query
Sorry, Mr. Donnelly. I haven't used these boards until now. I was thinking that new messages just get buried in old threads and never seen. So I thought I would post a new thread, hoping to get Mr. Lawless's attention, since he did not respond to the previous (second) thread. I apologize if this was wrong. Is there any other way you know of to get a response?

Re: Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Posted: 20 Apr 2013 1:16AM GMT
Classification: Query
A SINGLE CONTINUING thread is almost always more effective than multiple threads.

Why expect staff or helpful contributors to jump all over multiple threads/boards instead of following a single, contiguous and, hopefully, coherent, thread?

Re: Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Posted: 20 Apr 2013 11:40PM GMT
Classification: Query
Thank you for your advice, Mr. Donnelly. I have taken it and posted my query to Mr. Lawless on the original thread.

Re: Where Are You Mike Lawless?

Posted: 22 Apr 2013 9:43PM GMT
Classification: Query
Thank you again, Mr. Donnelly. I now see that when a new message is added to an old thread, the thread itself comes up to the top of the list. I didn't know that. Now I do.
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions