Search for content in message boards

Re: Abused and Used: Public Trees vs. Private Trees

Replies: 98

Re: Abused and Used: Public Trees vs. Private Trees

Posted: 31 May 2009 2:26PM GMT
Classification: Query
Your main points appear to be "the difference is the reduced level of service and resources from when a Public Tree encounters a Private Tree. . . . . there are differences between Public and Private trees with regard to each researching the other and needs to address it!"

Remember that the trees are uploaded by individuals. True, nearly all consist in material lifted from other trees. You appear to believe that owes you access to everything uploaded by everyone.

Trees "each researching the other . . ." ? Trees do not do research. People do. Most submitted trees, however, are not the result of research in records. What you mean is that you want access to all instances where someone may have information you want. Many who have done actual research do not want the results of their work, their time and their resources to be simply lifted by others, and have made their trees private. Those who do not want others linking to their trees, who do not want others lifting their photos, documents and transcripts, etc., have often made their trees private to prevent this sort of activity by tree vampires.

Other tree submitters do not have a "right" to such data as has been made private, but can request it. If the owner of a private tree declines to share it, that is their right.

The best way to get accuracy in your tree is to do the actual research in local records yourself.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
scorahic 31 May 2009 5:43PM GMT 
AGHatchett3rd 31 May 2009 6:52PM GMT 
frostfreedet 31 May 2009 8:26PM GMT 
pjbuk007 31 May 2009 8:55PM GMT 
helfertk 1 Jun 2009 1:44PM GMT 
mimosette 1 Jun 2009 7:17PM GMT 
steve19811 13 Jul 2009 10:30AM GMT 
SherryJEdgar 14 Sep 2009 9:06AM GMT 
nanablue2007 17 Sep 2009 10:27AM GMT 
A_Transcriber 1 Oct 2009 2:22PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic