Search for content in message boards

Re: Abused and Used: Public Trees vs. Private Trees

Replies: 98

Re: Abused and Used: Public Trees vs. Private Trees

Posted: 31 May 2009 11:43AM GMT
Classification: Query
Thank you for your thoughtful reply - your points are well taken and the logic seems appropriate. I believe there is still disparity between Public and Private trees, however. Private Trees can view Public trees without invite, but Public Trees CANNOT view Private Trees without invite. Therein lies the rub, and the difference is the reduced level of service and resources from Ancestry.com when a Public Tree encounters a Private Tree. Public Trees encounter delays or dead-ends when encountering a Private Tree. Private Trees do not encounter those obstacles when researching Public Trees. For lack of a better term, there's a reverse correlation or an inverse relationship between the resources available when one type of tree researches the other. I respect the choice of privacy on the part of some of my fellow genealogists. The point I'm making is that we all pay the same but there are differences between Public and Private trees with regard to each researching the other and Ancestry.com needs to address it! My suggestion that Public trees be made private (only) to those with Private trees might level the field a bit. What would be unfair about that? Again, thank you.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
scorahic 31 May 2009 5:43PM GMT 
AGHatchett3rd 31 May 2009 6:52PM GMT 
frostfreedet 31 May 2009 8:26PM GMT 
pjbuk007 31 May 2009 8:55PM GMT 
helfertk 1 Jun 2009 1:44PM GMT 
mimosette 1 Jun 2009 7:17PM GMT 
steve19811 13 Jul 2009 10:30AM GMT 
SherryJEdgar 14 Sep 2009 9:06AM GMT 
nanablue2007 17 Sep 2009 10:27AM GMT 
A_Transcriber 1 Oct 2009 2:22PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions