Search for content in message boards

Suggestion that teafor2/obits/etc. posts be confined to one annual thread each

Replies: 43

Re: Suggestion that teafor2/obits/etc. posts be confined to one annual thread each

Posted: 29 Dec 2012 10:48PM GMT
Classification: Query
Joan said:
Why would ANY poster attach additional posts on UNrelated people/subjects into a single thread."

Because they ARE related. By geography and surname. All Smith burials listed on a site, is the generic classification.

Joan said:
"Also, suppose something is in error and needs to be deleted (I've had the Teafor2 posters ask on occasion to delete a post so that they can make a corrected post) and in the middle of a thread this wouldn't be possible."

A deletion in the middle of such a thread would not be necessary. All he/she has to do is edit that individual post to nothing but a placeholder.


Always the defender of the mighty Acom/RW status quo aren't you? It is just so wonderful that they got everything exactly right when they set the boards up.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
mikef333 29 Dec 2012 5:28AM GMT 
ludlowbaylive 29 Dec 2012 9:20AM GMT 
mikef333 29 Dec 2012 10:26AM GMT 
ludlowbaylive 29 Dec 2012 5:31PM GMT 
mikef333 29 Dec 2012 9:30PM GMT 
jmyoung365 29 Dec 2012 11:09PM GMT 
mikef333 30 Dec 2012 4:15AM GMT 
jmyoung365 30 Dec 2012 5:39AM GMT 
mikef333 30 Dec 2012 5:48AM GMT 
jmyoung365 30 Dec 2012 6:33AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | New Terms and Conditions