Search for content in message boards

A Disturbing Development Inre Source Document Data

Replies: 57

Re: A Disturbing Development Inre Source Document Data

Posted: 8 Mar 2013 3:56PM GMT
Classification: Query
I used the record to create a new person in my public tree.

It created John Craddock Daggs, born about 1877 in Kansas.

What are you seeing that is alarming? That the alternate info added by nancydrewfan in 2009 is reflected?

One of the complaints I've heard for years is that the alternate info we supply is never incorporated. I don't like the fact that there is no "control" - that is, I often see that someone with no family knowledge adds incorrect alternate info on my direct line - and it is impossible to get rid of, once it has been cast in ancestry stone.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
BrklynBridge 8 Mar 2013 10:35PM GMT 
McComberdesce... 8 Mar 2013 10:47PM GMT 
BrklynBridge 8 Mar 2013 10:58PM GMT 
BurgessDonnel... 8 Mar 2013 11:01PM GMT 
BurgessDonnel... 8 Mar 2013 10:56PM GMT 
BrklynBridge 8 Mar 2013 11:01PM GMT 
BurgessDonnel... 8 Mar 2013 11:04PM GMT 
debbiealogy 8 Mar 2013 11:00PM GMT 
BrklynBridge 8 Mar 2013 11:20PM GMT 
debbiealogy 8 Mar 2013 11:40PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions