I used the record to create a new person in my public tree.
It created John Craddock Daggs, born about 1877 in Kansas.
What are you seeing that is alarming? That the alternate info added by nancydrewfan in 2009 is reflected?
One of the complaints I've heard for years is that the alternate info we supply is never incorporated. I don't like the fact that there is no "control" - that is, I often see that someone with no family knowledge adds incorrect alternate info on my direct line - and it is impossible to get rid of, once it has been cast in ancestry stone.