Search for content in message boards

Private Trees and DNA Contacts

Replies: 300

Re: Private Trees and DNA Contacts

Posted: 29 Jan 2013 11:45AM GMT
Classification: Query
"Sometimes these matches do have ancestry trees that are not linked to the dna test. You can look at these for clues."

If you're referring to your matches that don't have a tree attached then yes you can see them but you may as well be looking at any tree on Ancestry that shares surnames since without the DNA being attached to someone in the tree there's no way to tell who the DNA match's direct ancestors are. I suspect Ancestry defaults to the home person in the tree for the calculation and that's probably accurate a lot of the time but I'm not going to waste time and effort on a tree when I can't say for sure that the owner is even the correct starting point.

If you're referring to private trees as your post implies you're just plain wrong.

FWIW: The private tree matches I receive are going to continue to go to the trashcan until Ancestry provides me with some sort of clue as to the who, what, or where of the DNA match. I may be missing a clue or two by doing that but my experience with private trees so far tells me that the odds are long and the messaging hassle is more effort than it's worth.

The above said, my thanks to the few private trees that I reached out to early on who gave access without the plethora of excuses. They were the exception to the norm.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
APTurner 24 Dec 2012 12:36AM GMT 
DPotts57 24 Dec 2012 10:10AM GMT 
exploringspac... 27 Jan 2013 12:47AM GMT 
joyecho 28 Jan 2013 4:34PM GMT 
DPotts57 29 Jan 2013 6:45PM GMT 
joyecho 29 Jan 2013 9:39PM GMT 
MJ782 2 Feb 2013 2:09AM GMT 
lilyione 7 Feb 2013 10:37PM GMT 
LeeHigdonNewe... 8 Feb 2013 12:09PM GMT 
jennyology77 6 Feb 2013 3:33PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions