Search for content in message boards

Puzzled by ethnic breakdown

Replies: 77

Re: Puzzled by ethnic breakdown

Posted: 5 Jan 2013 2:37PM GMT
Classification: Query
Edited: 5 Jan 2013 3:16PM GMT
They seem to be assigning U.S. first arrivals/ and or surnames to certain groups and ethnic backgrounds. The challenge with this is that I am not sure it is that clear. Those ancient persons did not take the test and were certainly complex in their own heritage. Both the Brits and Scandinavia had mariners. The women may have stayed in one location but their names changed so trying to determine a heritage by surname or locations seems challenging. And we know the ones first into the U.S. were most likely to be the ones who traveled since they came here.

It makes sense to me that a certain surname or location may be more likely to be a certain ethnicity but should this be assumed or assumed for particular individuals. Also they seem to be assigning certain points of origin to different groups. I just don't see how it can be determined that a people living in proximity to each other could be so finely separated in ethnicity? And then add that to the fact that many in those countries were made up of many mariners and traveled both locally and more distantly. Even the royal families intermarried across nations and had ties to what are now considered other areas.


SubjectAuthorDate Posted
jbarry6899 5 Jan 2013 6:18PM GMT 
SCnMD 5 Jan 2013 8:07PM GMT 
scwbcm 5 Jan 2013 9:37PM GMT 
jbarry6899 5 Jan 2013 10:37PM GMT 
scwbcm 5 Jan 2013 11:40PM GMT 
jbarry6899 6 Jan 2013 12:01AM GMT 
scwbcm 6 Jan 2013 12:16AM GMT 
jbarry6899 6 Jan 2013 12:47AM GMT 
scwbcm 6 Jan 2013 1:10AM GMT 
jbarry6899 6 Jan 2013 1:19AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions