Search for content in message boards

Only female common ancestors?

Replies: 46

Re: Only female common ancestors?

Posted: 2 Jan 2013 2:47PM GMT
Classification: Query
Sherburl, thanks for the screenshots, that was helpful. I don't know if it's having Jewish ancestry that means I'm not getting the hints (we have a harder time with paper trails past the mid-19th century) or just dumb luck, but I haven't seen any hints yet. For the regular Ancestry side, yes, lots of them, including a few potentially shared family trees (some that are correct even).

As for the phasing argument elsewhere in this thread, I've seen it discussed at length and the consensus is no, it's not happening. After all, you can't phase individuals. You can only do it if you have at least two people in a known relationship to each other where they don't share two parents. The ideal set of people to phase is one person with each of his or her parents.

Cyndi
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
scwbcm 2 Jan 2013 10:30PM GMT 
sherburl 2 Jan 2013 9:10PM GMT 
cyndi308 2 Jan 2013 9:47PM GMT 
smsitton 2 Jan 2013 9:55PM GMT 
sherburl 2 Jan 2013 10:02PM GMT 
smsitton 2 Jan 2013 10:28PM GMT 
cyndi308 2 Jan 2013 10:30PM GMT 
sherburl 2 Jan 2013 10:53PM GMT 
sl_kelly 2 Jan 2013 10:58PM GMT 
sl_kelly 2 Jan 2013 9:20PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | Terms and Conditions