Search for content in message boards

Ancestry.com DNA is NOT a waste for money for many...

Replies: 26

Re: Ancestry.com DNA is NOT a waste for money for many...

Posted: 25 Jan 2013 9:57PM GMT
Classification: Query
It does mean you share some amount of autosomal DNA with them that you both inherited from a common ancestor, but it doesn't tell you whether it is 100 years or 300 years ago. The prediction that it is in the 4th cousin level has not been very reliable, but you are related in some fashion. The best way to use the product is to develop your own family tree out at least four or five generations, then start looking for common surnames, locations etc...almost the way you would if you were doing paper research, but the dna results point you in the right direction to look. It does require that you do some old fashion genealogical research to use the dna results best. However, ancestry.com only shows you ten generations of common surnames..beyond that you have to hunt for yourself in matching trees.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
smsitton 20 Jan 2013 7:54PM GMT 
sherburl 20 Jan 2013 8:30PM GMT 
memorykeeper0... 21 Jan 2013 6:22AM GMT 
LeeHigdonNewe... 22 Jan 2013 11:26AM GMT 
Carrie_Rowlan... 22 Jan 2013 4:01PM GMT 
smsitton 22 Jan 2013 4:25PM GMT 
DPotts57 22 Jan 2013 4:46PM GMT 
MJ782 24 Jan 2013 9:32PM GMT 
knordbrad 26 Jan 2013 4:07AM GMT 
smsitton 26 Jan 2013 4:57AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | New Terms and Conditions