Search for content in message boards

Problems with US City Directories on Ancestry (3) -1933 City Directory Listed as 1903

Replies: 4

Re: 1933 City Directory Listed as 1903

Posted: 13 Oct 2012 11:32PM GMT
Classification: Query
Edited: 14 Oct 2012 2:06AM GMT
eGENEee posted
"A stamp doesn't prove when it was published. You need to publication date (printed) to be absolutely sure."
deleted upon my following rebuttal.

I won't dispute that statement But I know Grand parents weren't in Oregon in 1903 all empirical family evidence of several uncles proves to Me it is the 1933 book But for those that blindly follow believe if you must.......

3 1st cousins listed were born 1909, 1911, and 1913
2 are listed as students and one as bookkeeper.....

It is not a 1903 city directory....
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
SoakedKarma 2 May 2012 1:26PM GMT 
eGENEee 11 May 2012 12:12AM GMT 
SoakedKarma 14 Oct 2012 5:32AM GMT 
Fiona_Bathgat... 14 Oct 2012 12:20PM GMT 
SoakedKarma 18 Oct 2012 12:06PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | New Terms and Conditions