Search for content in message boards

U. S. City Directories (1821-1989) Beta OCR misreads Addresses

Replies: 1

U. S. City Directories (1821-1989) Beta OCR misreads Addresses

Posted: 2 Sep 2012 4:51PM GMT
Classification: Query
I have really enjoyed the new US city directories collection. It is as advertised better than the previous city directory collection. However I find continuous errors caused by the OCR process in reading addresses. The process seems to conflate addresses and occupations in numerous cases. For example, consider this case:

[Hard copy directory and Ancestry.com image]
Public, John Q barber r1100 Maple Ave

[Ancestry.com record produced by OCR]
Public, John Q Barber
Street address: 00 Maple Ave.
Occupation:r11

I have "corrected" numerous of these types of errors so that searching will yield more accurate results.

A lesson here for researchers is always look at the image. I know Ancestry.com is seeking to improve the OCR process along with other issues in this very useful database. I just hope it's sooner rather than later
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
craigmanson54 2 Sep 2012 10:51PM GMT 
SoakedKarma 14 Oct 2012 5:18AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | Terms and Conditions