Search for content in message boards

Footnote vs. World Vital Records

Replies: 1

Footnote vs. World Vital Records

Posted: 26 Feb 2011 5:20PM GMT
Classification: Query
Which one is better / more useful?
That is, which adds the most information that is not replicated at ancestry.com?
Footnote is $80 per year vs. World Vital Records at $60 per year. I'd rather not pay for both, especially if there is minimal add.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
macoverton 27 Feb 2011 12:20AM GMT 
gratop 27 Feb 2011 9:35PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | New Terms and Conditions