Search for content in message boards

Reliability of trees on

Replies: 6

Re: Reliability of trees on

Posted: 6 Feb 2013 10:07AM GMT
Classification: Query
the give 2 e-mail links for contact, the first I tried, did not deliver, I am waiting for the second one. Both names are not listed with the apg, and they give no information about the "30 professional researchers" working there or how they located their sources. I actually wanted to alert them that their "van SLyck" data is completely wrong and outdated, of course the visible tree, does not show any input date, however this is an example of bad "professional research, if they even ever did this, it looks like they just copied LDS files (old ones)I wonder if they respond to my complaint. I would not use them for $45 an hour, going to 1500 must cost an arm and a leg.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
jeremy1967 23 Jan 2013 12:59PM GMT 
mi2early 23 Jan 2013 2:19PM GMT 
vanboerum2 6 Feb 2013 5:07PM GMT 
jeremy1967 6 Feb 2013 5:18PM GMT 
Robyne_Moulds 8 Mar 2013 9:28PM GMT 
jeremy1967 10 Mar 2013 4:44PM GMT 
thulse121 15 Apr 2013 3:36AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic