FTM 2009 - places
Replies: 12
Re: FTM 2009 - places
 DevonJon
(View posts)
|
Posted: 7 Jul 2009 12:44PM GMT |
Classification: Query
Totally agree and sorry to have 2 posts running ! the query evolved as I ate lunch !
I am happy with residence. I agree census is source citation. I just kinda wish I didn't have to have to start developing a seperate fact for each occupation at each census.Again its an issue of going back to start. I also don't like that when I do the FTM thing(ie: place is say manchester and use description field for say '8 Wood end Lane, Hyde , Manchester') it is viewable as a fact but says 'manchester, lancashire/ 8 wood end lane, hyde.' Which looks odd.
I am happy with residence. I agree census is source citation. I just kinda wish I didn't have to have to start developing a seperate fact for each occupation at each census.Again its an issue of going back to start. I also don't like that when I do the FTM thing(ie: place is say manchester and use description field for say '8 Wood end Lane, Hyde , Manchester') it is viewable as a fact but says 'manchester, lancashire/ 8 wood end lane, hyde.' Which looks odd.