Search for content in message boards

City Without County in Place Hierarchy?

Replies: 23

Re: City Without County in Place Hierarchy?

Posted: 27 Sep 2012 3:57PM GMT
Classification: Query
KathyMarieAnn,

The management of places is no doubt improved with FTM becoming a bit more jurisdictionally aware, but we obviously agree that it has shortcomings, particularly because of its tie-in with an inadequate PNA.

There is nothing inherently wrong with GPS coordinates. The problem is only how they're used. There is no reason that they cannot be grouped into a set to define an area. The problem here is that the Places workspace in FTM isn't equipped to deal with that. Another shortcoming.

But let's get back to the matter at hand. If I were to make a suggestion for an enhancement that would accommodate a city without a county in the place hierarchy, how would *you* want that handled by FTM?
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
Marco Scavo 27 Sep 2012 2:56AM GMT 
Marco Scavo 27 Sep 2012 3:17AM GMT 
kj_norway 27 Sep 2012 4:38AM GMT 
silverfox3280 27 Sep 2012 5:20AM GMT 
Marco Scavo 27 Sep 2012 3:00PM GMT 
KATHYMARIEANN 27 Sep 2012 3:51PM GMT 
Marco Scavo 27 Sep 2012 4:58PM GMT 
KATHYMARIEANN 27 Sep 2012 9:35PM GMT 
Marco Scavo 27 Sep 2012 9:57PM GMT 
kj_norway 27 Sep 2012 10:15PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions