Search for content in message boards

Alternate Place Names - Proper Documentation

Replies: 17

Re: Alternate Place Names - Proper Documentation

Posted: 13 Nov 2012 8:52AM GMT
Classification: Query
This question comes up a lot, and there is no good answer. FTM is not explicitly designed to handle historical locations, so the best advice you'll get here is how people work around this shortcoming in the program.

(As far as I know, at this time none of the other major genealogical programs relate historical locations to modern ones.)

As far as I gather from previous discussions, there are three methods most widely used:

1) Historical place names are used in the place field and the errors from the Place Name Authority (PNA) are ignored; some people go to the extra length of setting the GPS coordinates on the map in the Places workspace, but this data doesn't export and won't even appear in a report, so it's only good for your map screen (it also doesn't translate to the map at for linked trees). People who use this method usually make note of the modern location either in the description (not exportable via GEDCOM) or in the fact notes (exportable, but not visible at for linked trees) or they put it in both. This method is probably the one preferred by the more serious genealogists, because it's true to the data.

2) Modern locations are always used in the place field and note is made of the historical location in the description, notes, or both. This method is probably most compatible with the way FTM and are set up.

3) Each fact is duplicated so that there are two instances of the place field. In one the modern place is inserted; in the other, the historical.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
Beth_Unrein 12 Nov 2012 11:22PM GMT 
ad4hc 13 Nov 2012 12:47PM GMT 
ad4hc 13 Nov 2012 6:45PM GMT 
MarcoScavo 13 Nov 2012 3:52PM GMT 
Beth_Unrein 13 Nov 2012 4:02PM GMT 
David Abernat... 13 Nov 2012 4:31PM GMT 
Beth_Unrein 15 Nov 2012 3:59PM GMT 
keithnuttle 15 Nov 2012 4:26PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic