Search for content in message boards

Source Citations

Replies: 17

Re: Source Citations

Posted: 28 Nov 2012 8:06PM GMT
Classification: Query
Edited: 28 Nov 2012 8:11PM GMT
I don't agree with that tech support person. That would discard the system's current flexibility--and one that Ancestry.com already employs repeatedly. Consider their state census collections. In all that I've seen, there is only one source for them, regardless of date. (I always have to remake them.) The date is distinguished in the citation detail.

The solution is not to force users to create a new source for each edition. All that matters is how the source citation is formatted whenever it's used (e.g., in a report). How we get there doesn't matter--as long as the methods available do not prescribe countless hours of data entry.

Additionally, it's hardly a defense for them to say that the field in question here serves no purpose. That's a bit aggravating.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
Marco Scavo 29 Nov 2012 3:06AM GMT 
kj_norway 29 Nov 2012 3:09AM GMT 
Marco Scavo 29 Nov 2012 3:17AM GMT 
kj_norway 29 Nov 2012 3:18AM GMT 
Marco Scavo 29 Nov 2012 6:15AM GMT 
kj_norway 29 Nov 2012 3:14PM GMT 
Marco Scavo 29 Nov 2012 4:49PM GMT 
D. Shuler 5 Dec 2012 3:17AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | Terms and Conditions