Search for content in message boards

Unrecognised place names - because they no longer exist FTM2012

Replies: 21

Re: Unrecognised place names - because they no longer exist FTM2012

Posted: 9 Jan 2013 7:25PM GMT
Classification: Query
no, because neither of those are the place name I want to have recorded.

I simply want to be able to add North Yorkshire as it was, and then add Arkengarthdale as it was, so that both are in the right locations and show up in my lists correctly.

I'm not after resolving the place name to what the location might be known as today, I really do want to record the place as it was 150 years ago.

Thanks for the suggestion though
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
kmthomster 10 Jan 2013 1:58AM GMT 
tulrose 10 Jan 2013 2:03AM GMT 
kmthomster 10 Jan 2013 2:25AM GMT 
BurgessDonnel... 10 Jan 2013 3:01AM GMT 
kmthomster 10 Jan 2013 3:06AM GMT 
BurgessDonnel... 10 Jan 2013 3:23AM GMT 
kmthomster 10 Jan 2013 3:34AM GMT 
AGHatchett3rd 10 Jan 2013 3:42AM GMT 
kmthomster 10 Jan 2013 3:45AM GMT 
BurgessDonnel... 10 Jan 2013 3:47AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions