Search for content in message boards

SURVEY - What facts do you feel comfortable merging from Public Member Trees?

Replies: 69

Re: SURVEY - What facts do you feel comfortable merging from Public Member Trees?

Posted: 19 Feb 2013 11:46AM GMT
Classification: Query
Don't know how many have implemented FAMily_asChild.STATus, but only one (that I know of) has the feature integrated into its export/import of a GEDCOM file.

So what I'm saying is not actually what you think I'm saying. Right now, FTM does not have a Child_Family_Status. But if you or someone asks to have this type of status implement, then be sure to say that the information needs to be implemented in the GEDCOM Import and Export correctly.

This is the same thing they refuse to implement regarding married name. I send a GEDCOM with a name.type of "married" and they drop the tag, so FTM never knows that I've given them a married name and they then generate a married name by using the spouses surname. Which in non-USA terms could be very wrong. I can go on and on about these things.
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
silverfox3280 19 Feb 2013 3:10PM GMT 
Rich Canfield 20 Feb 2013 2:00AM GMT 
kj_norway 19 Feb 2013 5:31PM GMT 
silverfox3280 19 Feb 2013 5:53PM GMT 
kj_norway 19 Feb 2013 6:46PM GMT 
kj_norway 19 Feb 2013 7:23PM GMT 
KATHYMARIEANN 19 Feb 2013 8:26PM GMT 
kj_norway 19 Feb 2013 8:59PM GMT 
Rich Canfield 19 Feb 2013 11:29PM GMT 
kj_norway 18 Feb 2013 7:02PM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | Privacy | Terms and Conditions