I didn't consider those image sets that had been downloaded for review and the rejected stuff too. Just goes to show it is the percentage which reflects the accuracy of the project rather than the image set figures.
For the Kansas project there must have been a lot of activity over those days I mentioned.
For my own interest and because I am curious I'll take note of the figures and percentages for keying in future.
Its when you see the figures alter you feel like you have achieved something when reviewing, especially with the Kansas project being so big.
Thank you for helping me see the bigger picture