Search for content in message boards

Texas, Convict Ledgers - Project Feedback

Replies: 4

Re: Texas, Convict Ledgers - Project Feedback

Posted: 16 Dec 2013 1:49AM GMT
Classification: Query
I have a similar situation with the Pennsylvania, Society of Mayflower Descendants Applications project, by the way - although I only reviewed a few of the image sets, I think every single "Line of Eligibility" form type that I reviewed had to be classed as "inferred information that was not on the record" because they had all inferred a gender for people 3a and 3b (just listed on the form as "and had... name ... married... name" with nothing to say "son" or "daughter".) But looking at the project stats, only 3% are "inferred information" and 70% are "keyed correctly", so it seems as though no other reviewer has come across this problem?
SubjectAuthorDate Posted
DoniaF 15 Dec 2013 7:37PM GMT 
katerimmer 15 Dec 2013 7:58PM GMT 
DoniaF 15 Dec 2013 8:02PM GMT 
katerimmer 15 Dec 2013 8:25PM GMT 
katerimmer 16 Dec 2013 8:49AM GMT 
per page

Find a board about a specific topic

  • Visit our other sites:

© 1997-2014 Ancestry.com | Corporate Information | New Privacy | New Terms and Conditions